Common Core ≠ Globally Competitive Studens?

Today I read Chapter 1 of Yong Zhao’s book, World Class Learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students.  Found it fascinating, especially as I’m currently immersed in the ELA standards for Social Studies and History in preparation for a talk on “Digital Archives in Support of Common Core State Standards.”

Dr Zhao asserts that homogenized curriculum/common standards will not produce globally competitive citizens.  Why? The standards movement assumes the old educational paradigm, designed to train people for local jobs and instill local social and cultural norms, but globalization and technology have changed the rules of the game.

  1. Given two people with equal skills, the one willing to work for less money will get the job.
  2. We don’t know what the jobs of the future will be.
  3. Jobs that can be automated will be; routine work will be sent to countries where labor costs are least.
  4. The world our children live in is global; nothing in the common core prepares them to work with or even get along with people in other parts of the world.
  5. Globalization and technology offer great opportunities; these will be greatest for individuals who do NOT fit the mold, who can add value that no one else can (e.g.  Pink’s design, story, symphony, empathy, etc.).

There seems to be an assumption among those who support the common core state standards that if we in the United States adopt common standards that are internationally bench-marked, and we are successful in teaching all students to reach these standards, that somehow that will make us globally competitive.  Why?  Do we think we will succeed where the countries against whom we benchmark will not?  Are we going to teach this common core better than anyone else, so the quality of or graduate’s work will be so superior they will get the job and at a higher pay?  At the very best, the success of common core might level the international playing field, but a level field does not win us the game.  The skills and tricks that would do that reside in all those other disciplines, talents, and skills that common core not only does not address but, given the curriculum narrowing Dr. Zhao describes, get squeezed out.  Not a pretty picture.


1 thought on “Common Core ≠ Globally Competitive Studens?”

  1. How about if we do what we do best, i.e., innovate. Of course, our government run schools don’t train us to be innovative. So where do parents go to provide their kids with innovative educations?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s